Correction note: A previous version of this article incorrectly stated improper federal government payments were an estimated $150 million in fiscal year 2018. The article was updated to reflect the accurate figure of around $150 billion.

President Donald Trump has a new piece of bipartisan legislation on his desk after Rep. Angie Craig, who represents Minnesota’s Second Congressional District, alongside two Republican lawmakers and a Democrat, put forth a bill last week aimed at significantly reducing government spending.

The bill, called the Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019, seeks to put controls in place for improper government payments.

In fiscal year 2018, the Government Accountability Office estimated that improper payments throughout the federal government were just over $150 billion with the majority of those coming from Medicare, Medicaid and the earned income tax credit. Since 2003, when agencies were first required to report improper payments, improper payment estimates were over $1.4 trillion.

Craig, who spoke to the Herald last Friday after the bill passed the U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday, Feb. 5, believes the across-the-aisle cooperation is a mark of hope for alleviating partisan politics.  

“If we work to find common ground in this country, we can find it,” Craig told the Herald. “This town [Washington, DC] doesn’t make it easy to find it.”

The bill, which signals the first time any of Minnesota’s freshmen lawmakers have had a bill reach the president’s desk, gained the cosponsorship of Reps. Mark Meadows (R-NC), Cheri Bustos (D-IL) and Greg Gianforte (R-MT).

Whether President Trump decides to sign the bill into law or forego a veto for 10 days, the Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019 puts in place checks that “force agencies to learn from past mistakes,” Craig said.

Taken from a release from Craig’s office, the Payment Integrity Information Act would:

•  require agencies to undertake additional efforts and develop plans to prevent improper payments before they happen,

•  improve the way agencies identify programs with the highest risk of improper payments,

•  require the Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE) to issue guidance to improve annual reporting on agencies’ compliance with improper payment statutes, and

•  create a working group that will enable federal agencies to collaborate with each other and non-federal agencies, such as state governments, to develop strategies for addressing key drivers of improper payments, such as fraud and eligibility determinations in state-managed federal benefits programs.

Not everyone is convinced that Craig has bipartisan cooperation as a guiding principal. Regina Barr, who is running for Craig’s seat in 2020 as a Republican, criticized Craig for her alleged partisanship in a statement.

“Our fight against radical liberal Angie Craig is picking up steam and getting national attention,” Barr said per a release. “Our district is key to flipping back the U.S. House and turning Minnesota Red. We are working hard on the ground here across the district and that is being noticed. Together, we can take back our district and move our country forward.”

When asked to respond to Barr’s criticism, Craig challenged voters to review her voting record in Washington.

“I think the voters of the Second District are smart,” Craig said. “Any effort to tie me to anybody else but my own work does not give enough credit to how smart the voters in the Second District are.”

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.